-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.4k
collect index formatting tests #19661
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #19661 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 91.58% 91.58%
=======================================
Files 150 150
Lines 48867 48867
=======================================
Hits 44755 44755
Misses 4112 4112
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
"'2011-01-01 10:00:00+00:00', 'NaT'], " | ||
"dtype='datetime64[ns, UTC]', freq=None)""") | ||
|
||
with pd.option_context('display.width', 300): |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
looks fine. can you parameterize these (and others that look similar)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Managed to parametrize a couple of for loops. There is probably more than can be done in the next pass.
thanks! |
It looks like PeriodIndex/TDI/DTI tests are using different rules for what constitutes test_indexing/test_setops. Double-checking before making a PR:
test_get_loc_* --> test_indexing
test_get_indexer_* --> test_indexing
test_insert_* --> test_indexing
test_where_* --> test_indexing
test_join_* --> test_setops
test_append_* --> test_setops
test_difference_* --> test_setops
Many of these at the moment are in e.g. test_ops or test_period/test_datetime.